Protocols for Data Collection, Management and Treatment

Epidemiologists and other researchers must plan study protocols that incorporate objective monitoring of physical activity and/or sedentary behaviours by systematically considering all of the complex logistics associated with data collection, management and treatment. With regard to data collection, instrument choice is a foremost consideration, largely shaped by the researcher’s questions and available resources. Instrument-specific features may provide greater analytical capacity, but can also greatly complicate planning and must be accommodated. Data collection decisions also include the duration of monitoring required to establish stable estimates of behaviour, without overburdening participants. Data management concerns include systematic processes for quality control, data cleaning, data organization and storage. Data treatment includes decision rules that further shape the accumulated information, including computation of derived variables (as catalogued in Chap. 3) in anticipation of subsequent data analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic €32.70 /Month

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

eBook EUR 96.29 Price includes VAT (France)

Softcover Book EUR 94.94 Price includes VAT (France)

Hardcover Book EUR 94.94 Price includes VAT (France)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Similar content being viewed by others

Organizing and Analyzing the Activity Data in NHANES

Article 09 February 2019

A model for presenting accelerometer paradata in large studies: ISCOLE

Article Open access 20 April 2015

Best practices for analyzing large-scale health data from wearables and smartphone apps

Article Open access 03 June 2019

References

  1. Tudor-Locke C, Barreira TV, Schuna JM, et al. Improving wear time compliance with a 24-hour waist-worn accelerometer protocol in the International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment (ISCOLE). Int J Behv Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:11. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Tudor-Locke C, Camhi SM, Troiano RP. A catalog of rules, variables, and definitions applied to accelerometer data in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003–2006. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E113. PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Rogers LQ. Objective monitoring of physical activity after a cancer diagnosis: challenges and opportunities for enhancing cancer control. Phys Ther Rev. 2010;15(3):224–37. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Trost SG, McIver KL, Pate RR. Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11 Suppl):S531–43. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Crouter SE, Flynn JI, Bassett DR. Estimating physical activity in youth using a wrist accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(5):944–51. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Hart TL, McClain JJ, Tudor-Locke C. Controlled and free-living evaluation of objective measures of sedentary and active behaviors. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8(6):848–57. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gorelick ML, Bizzini M, Maffiuletti NA, et al. Test–retest reliability of the IDEEA system in the quantification of step parameters during walking and stair climbing. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2009;29(4):271–6. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kozey-Keadle S, Libertine A, Staudenmayer J, et al. The feasibility of reducing and measuring sedentary time among overweight, non-exercising office workers. J Obes. 2012;2012:282303. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Stanton R, Guertler D, Duncan MJ, et al. Validation of a pouch-mounted activPAL3 accelerometer. Gait Posture. 2014;40(4):688–93. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Harrington DM, Dowd KP, Tudor-Locke C, et al. A steps/minute value for moderate intensity physical activity in adolescent females. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2012;24:399–408. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Audrey S, Bell S, Hughes R, et al. Adolescent perspectives on wearing accelerometers to measure physical activity in population-based trials. Eur J Public Health. 2013;23(3):475–80. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Meltzer LJ, Montgomery-Downs HE, Insana SP, et al. Use of actigraphy for assessment in pediatric sleep research. Sleep Med Rev. 2012;16(5):463–75. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Rosenberger ME, Haskell WL, Albinali F, et al. Estimating activity and sedentary behavior from an accelerometer on the hip or wrist. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(5):964–75. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Masse LC, Fuemmeler BF, Anderson CB, et al. Accelerometer data reduction: a comparison of four reduction algorithms on select outcome variables. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11 Suppl):S544–54. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Tudor-Locke C, Johnson WD, Katzmarzyk PT. U.S. population profile of time-stamped accelerometer outputs: impact of wear time. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8:693–8. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Choi L, Ward SC, Schnelle JF, et al. Assessment of wear/nonwear time classification algorithms for triaxial accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(10):2009–16. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Troiano RP, McClain JJ, Brychta RJ, et al. Evolution of accelerometer methods for physical activity research. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(13):1019–23. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Aoyagi Y, Shephard RJ. Sex differences in relationship between habitual physical activity and health in the elderly: practical implications for epidemiologists based on pedometer/accelerometer data from the Nakanojo Study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013;56:327–38. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kinder JR, Lee KA, Thompson H, et al. Validation of a hip-worn accelerometer in measuring sleep time in children. J Pediatr Nurs. 2012;27(2):127–33. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Swartz AM, Strath SJ, Bassett DR, et al. Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9 Suppl):S450–6. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Tudor-Locke C, Barreira TV, Schuna Jr JM. Comparison of step outputs for waist and wrist accelerometer attachment sites. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(4):839–42. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Nilsson A, Ekelund U, Yngve A, et al. Assessing physical activity among children with accelerometers using different time sampling intervals and placements. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2002;14(1):87–96. Google Scholar
  23. McClain JJ, Abraham TL, Brusseau TA, et al. Epoch length and accelerometer outputs in children: comparison to direct observation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(12):2080–7. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Evenson KR, Catellier DJ, Gill K, et al. Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children. J Sports Sci. 2008;26(14):1557–65. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee IM, Shiroma EJ. Using accelerometers to measure physical activity in large-scale epidemiological studies: issues and challenges. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(3):197–201. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Inoue S, Ohya Y, Tudor-Locke C, et al. Time trends for step-determined physical activity among Japanese adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(10):1913–9. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Matthews CE, Ainsworth BE, Thompson RW, et al. Sources of variance in daily physical activity levels as measured by an accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(8):1376–81. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Yoshiuchi K, Nakahara R, Kumano H, et al. Yearlong physical activity and depressive symptoms in older Japanese adults: cross-sectional data from the Nakanojo study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;14(7):621–4. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Togo F, Watanabe E, Park H, et al. Meteorology and the physical activity of the elderly: the Nakanojo Study. Int J Biometeorol. 2005;50(2):83–9. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Felton GM, Tudor-Locke C, Burkett L. Reliability of pedometer-determined free-living physical activity data in college women. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2006;77(3):304–8. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Vincent SD, Pangrazi RP. An examination of the activity patterns of elementary school children. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2002;14:432–41. Google Scholar
  32. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994. Google Scholar
  33. Rowe DA, Kemble CD, Robinson TS, et al. Daily walking in older adults: day-to-day variability and criterion-referenced validity of total daily step counts. J Phys Act Health. 2007;4(4):434–46. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Trost SG, Pate RR, Freedson PS, et al. Using objective physical activity measures with youth: how many days of monitoring are needed? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(2):426–31. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Brooke HL, Corder K, Atkin AJ, et al. A systematic literature review with meta-analyses of within- and between-day differences in objectively measured physical activity in school-aged children. Sports Med. 2014;44(10):1427–38. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Tudor-Locke C, McClain JJ, Hart TL, et al. Expected values for pedometer-determined physical activity in youth. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2009;80(2):164–74. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Dasgupta K, Joseph L, Pilote L, et al. Daily steps are low year-round and dip lower in fall/winter: findings from a longitudinal diabetes cohort. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2010;9:81. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Silva P, Santos R, Welk G, et al. Seasonal differences in physical activity and sedentary patterns: the relevance of the PA context. J Sports Sci Med. 2011;10(1):66–72. PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Oliver M, Schluter PJ, Schofield GM, et al. Factors related to accelerometer-derived physical activity in Pacific children aged 6 years. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2011;23(1):44–56. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Chan CB, Ryan DA, Tudor-Locke C. Relationship between objective measures of physical activity and weather: a longitudinal study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006;3:21. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Tudor-Locke C, Bassett DR, Swartz AM, et al. A preliminary study of one year of pedometer self-monitoring. Behav Med. 2004;28(3):158–62. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Togo F, Watanabe E, Park H, et al. How many days of pedometer use predict the annual activity of the elderly reliably? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(6):1058–64. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, et al. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(1):181–8. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Rowlands AV, Gomersall SR, Tudor-Locke C, et al. Introducing novel approaches for examining the variability of individuals’ physical activity. J Sports Sci. 2014;21:1–10. Google Scholar
  45. Clemes SA, Deans NK. Presence and duration of reactivity to pedometers in adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(6):1097–101. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Matevey C, Rogers LQ, Dawson B, et al. Lack of reactivity during pedometer self-monitoring in adults. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2006;10(1):1–11. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Craig CL, Tudor-Locke C, Cragg S, et al. Process and treatment of pedometer data collection for youth: the CANPLAY study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(3):430–5. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Raustorp A, Ekroth Y. Eight-year secular trends of pedometer-determined physical activity in young Swedish adolescents. J Phys Act Health. 2010;7(3):369–74. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Dossegger A, Ruch N, Jimmy G, et al. Reactivity to accelerometer measurement of children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(6):1140–6. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Yasunaga A, Togo F, Watanabe E, et al. Yearlong physical activity and health-related quality of life in older Japanese adults: the Nakanojo Study. J Phys Act Health. 2006;14(3):288–301. Google Scholar
  51. Ward DS, Evenson KR, Vaughn A, et al. Accelerometer use in physical activity: best practices and research recommendations. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11 Suppl):S582–8. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Craig CL, Cameron C, Tudor-Locke C. CANPLAY pedometer normative reference data for 21,271 children and 12,956 adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(1):123–9. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Heil DP, Brage S, Rothney MP. Modeling physical activity outcomes from wearable monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(1 Suppl 1):S50–60. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Kang M, Rowe DA, Barreira TV, et al. Individual information-centered approach for handling physical activity missing data. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2009;80(2):131–7. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Catellier DJ, Hannan PJ, Murray DM, et al. Imputation of missing data when measuring physical activity by accelerometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11 Suppl):S555–62. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Rowe DA, Mahar MT, Raedeke TD, et al. Measuring physical activity in children with pedometers: reliability, reactivity, and replacement of missing data. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2004;16:343–54. Google Scholar
  57. Schuna Jr JM, Johnson WD, Tudor-Locke C. Adult self-reported and objectively monitored physical activity and sedentary behavior: NHANES 2005–2006. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10(1):126. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Herrmann SD, Barreira TV, Kang M, et al. How many hours are enough? Accelerometer wear time may provide bias in daily activity estimates. J Phys Act Health. 2012;10(5):742–9. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Schmidt MD, Blizzard CL, Venn AJ, et al. Practical considerations when using pedometers to assess physical activity in population studies: lessons from the Burnie Take Heart Study. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2007;78(3):162–70. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Tudor-Locke C, Barreira TV, Schuna JM, et al. Fully automated waist-worn accelerometer algorithm for detecting children’s sleep period time separate from 24-hour physical activity or sedentary behaviors. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2014;39(1):53–7. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Barreira TV, Schuna Jr JM, Mire EF, et al. Identifying children’s nocturnal sleep using 24-hour waist accelerometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(5):937–43. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(5):777–81. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Crouter SE, Clowers KG, Bassett DR. A novel method for using accelerometer data to predict energy expenditure. J Appl Physiol. 2006;100(4):1324–31. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Tudor-Locke C, Sisson SB, Collova T, et al. Pedometer-determined step count guidelines for classifying walking intensity in a young ostensibly healthy population. Can J Appl Physiol. 2005;30(6):666–76. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Staudenmayer J, Pober D, Crouter S, et al. An artificial neural network to estimate physical activity energy expenditure and identify physical activity type from an accelerometer. J Appl Physiol. 2009;107(4):1300–7. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Pober DM, Staudenmayer J, Raphael C, et al. Development of novel techniques to classify physical activity mode using accelerometers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(9):1626–34. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA Catrine Tudor-Locke
  1. Catrine Tudor-Locke